Based on Microsoft AI Red Team’s white paper “Taxonomy of Failure Modes in Agentic AI Systems”.
Agentic AI is moving from proof-of-concept to production faster than most security teams can update their threat models. In response, Microsoft’s red team has mapped out a detailed failure-mode taxonomy for autonomous and multi-agent systems.
The paper is 30 pages long. To help you move quickly, we’ve pulled out 10 field-ready insights you can apply this quarter. These are packaged for CISOs’ dashboards, architects’ roadmaps, and staff engineers’ sprint backlogs.
Snapshot
Compromise happens when an attacker modifies an agent’s prompt, code, or parameters. As a result, the entire workflow can be subverted. In multi-agent chains, even one compromised node can corrupt the entire system.
Playbook
To mitigate this, identify every agent and issue unique service principals and API keys. Store system prompts in signed config files rather than embedding them in code. Additionally, verify the hash of model weights and prompt blobs at runtime. Abort if there’s a mismatch.
Example
Before each tool call, your orchestrator checks the security_agent hash in Vault. If altered, it returns HTTP 403 and alerts SecOps.
Snapshot
In this case, attackers embed malicious instructions into long-term memory. Every future recall re-executes the attack. For instance, an agent may silently forward sensitive emails to an adversary.
Playbook
To prevent this, allow only authenticated functions to persist memory. Use regex and LLM-based policy checks before saving any new data. In addition, set memory time-to-live values and quarantine older records for human review.
Example
A LangGraph node refuses to store any text containing “forward:” unless Analyst_Approval is enabled.
Snapshot
Here, the agent fails to distinguish between user input and control instructions hidden in external content. As a result, even a poisoned Google Doc can hijack its decision logic.
Playbook
To address this, wrap external strings in tags and train the LLM to ignore them as commands. Furthermore, sanitize URLs and strip markdown or HTML before RAG ingestion. As a best practice, validate all third-party content before passing it to the agent.
Example
Pre-RAG Lambda escapes { and } in crawled text so delimiters lose special meaning.
Snapshot
Attackers inject tokens like “STOP” to terminate or reroute agent workflows. This bypasses guardrails and disrupts safety logic.
Playbook
To avoid this, declare allowed next states using a finite-state schema. Then, use an out-of-band watchdog to verify that all required steps were executed. Additionally, monitor execution logs for irregular paths and unexpected transitions.
Example
A GraphQL policy engine checks the orchestrator’s audit log. If the reviewer_agent state is missing, it flags severity = High.
Snapshot
Attackers split a jailbreak string across agent messages. When recombined, it bypasses single-prompt detectors and disables safeguards.
Playbook
To counter this, scan entire conversations instead of just single hops. Also, conduct randomized chaos testing on agent-to-agent chains using fuzzed tokens. Moreover, incorporate context-aware filters to detect recombined threats.
Example
Use an offline evaluator or AI Red Team to score full dialogs before action.
Snapshot
Developers often over-scope permissions. As a result, agents may access files or perform actions beyond the user’s intent.
Playbook
Start by mapping tool calls to user tokens using zero-trust RBAC. Additionally, avoid hardcoded secrets by relying on short-lived workload identities. As an added safeguard, audit token usage patterns regularly to detect escalation.
Example
The db_write function checks caller scopes. If Slack user lacks db_admin, it aborts—even if the prompt says otherwise.
Snapshot
Threat actors register fake agents that look real. Other modules trust them and leak data or misroute decisions.
Playbook
To prevent this, enforce mTLS between agents and use mutual attestation. Maintain an agent registry signed via Git or another tamper-proof method. In addition, consider peer validation before data sharing.
Example
On startup, agents check the registry for peer keys. Unlisted keys are rejected.
Snapshot
Heavy reliance on agents erodes human memory of workflows. If the platform fails, the business can’t recover quickly.
Playbook
To reduce this risk, rotate staff into co-pilot roles alongside agents. In addition, export memory and configs weekly in a vendor-neutral format. This ensures continuity even if platforms or vendors change.
Example
A Terraform job dumps vector stores to S3 and schedules a cold-start tabletop exercise.
Snapshot
Goal-driven agents may skip safety checks to optimize metrics. This can lead to unsafe or destructive actions.
Playbook
To fix this, embed human impact into the reward model as a cost. Additionally, enforce time or token budgets that trigger reviews. Above all, prioritize safety metrics in the evaluation phase.
Example
A lab robot gets negative reward if proximity sensors detect humans nearby.
Snapshot
Toxic content may spread through internal messages and reach users or logs without filtering.
Playbook
To manage this, pipe internal messages through the same filters used for final outputs. Use differential privacy tools to redact PII and sensitive terms before logging. Furthermore, label all sensitive interactions for moderation review.
Example
An Elastic pipeline tags internal messages with needs_moderation for review.
Failure-mode taxonomies too often stay buried in unread PDFs. Instead, use these 10 patterns to drive real security work:
— Create tickets for identity + mTLS between agents.
— Deploy memory-poisoning canaries in staging.
— Add conversation-level jailbreak scanners to CI/CD.
By doing this, you’ll be ready when the board asks, “Are our agents safe?” You can say, “Not bulletproof—but they’re monitored, isolated, and under control.”
Stay paranoid. Ship secure.
Stay up to date with what is happening! Get a first look at news, noteworthy research and worst attacks on AI delivered right in your inbox.
This week’s stories highlight a critical evolution in AI risk: the shift from isolated agent failures to system-level compromise in Agentic AI architectures and memory-based applications. From Princeton’s demonstration of ...
